Share your work online

Latest Updates

To what extent do the arguments against development aid outweigh the case for aid in poor countries?

Development Aid works well in some contexts, has no impact in others, and at times can cause negative outcomes in what has become the increasingly complex business of aid. The literature is now saturated; everyone has an opinion on whether or not aid is a good idea, and if it works (however that is measured). Scholars have argued convincingly for both sides of the polarised debate, but there is only a small body of literature that recognises the growing complexities of aid, focusing on reforming and strengthening the case for aid in poor countries. This paper addresses the critiques for and against DA, but also demonstrates that the picture is not entirely negative and that much can be done to improve the system. The question is not just whether the arguments detailing why aid doesn’t work outweigh the case for aid but how we make aid more effective and efficient.

This paper will not provide detailed analysis of the econometrics of the debate since that has already been covered sufficiently nor will it provide discussion on emergency aid, trade or debt. This paper will focus on Development Aid, otherwise referred to as official development assistance (ODA), and defined as aid which is given either bilaterally (from government to government) or multilaterally (from agencies like the World Bank to governments in recipient countries). DA largely consists of grants and concessional loans that are invested in infrastructure projects (roads, dams, and ports), the provision of large public goods, as well as the more traditional balance of payments support.

This paper will provide a broader analysis that goes beyond ‘cherry picked’ case studies, choosing instead to focus on the structural constraints that prevent effective aid delivery and augment the arguments of DA’s critics. Aid does work and is likely to always exist in some form so let the debate not be a question of whether or not to provide aid and why, but rather, what we can do to improve aid delivery and how we can constructively use critiques against aid to improve the system.

Author: Hannah Taylor  

HD PDF New To what extent do the arguments against development aid outweigh the case for aid in poor countries? (4526)

From Aid Effectiveness to Development Effectiveness: Paying Tribute to the WP-EFF

The Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness in 2005 was a watershed for the Development co-operation community and has since then been endorsed by more than 150 countries and major international organizations. Behind the Paris forum, and its successors the Accra and Busan forums (2008 and 2011), was the well known “Working Party on Aid Effectiveness”, or WP-EFF, an original global but informal multi-stakeholder partnership hosted by the OECD-DAC. In June 2012, as the WP-EFF is closing to leave the way to the new Global Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation, the OECD’s Hubert De Milly examines the origin and achievements of the WP-EFF, to better understand the pillars on which the new Partnership is built.

Article by Hubert De Milly

HD PDF New From Aid Effectiveness to Development Effectiveness: Paying Tribute to the WP-EFF (2084)

Under what circumstances are NGOs unable to gain access to vulnerable populations? What are the implications for aid policy?

Gaining access to vulnerable populations is frequently difficult. Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs) face many circumstances where they are unable to gain access to vulnerable populations, as well as fierce criticism when they fail in their relief efforts. As with much of aid and development, the story isn’t wholly negative and there have been significant technical innovations recently that have facilitated improved access for NGOs. NGOs continue to operate in remote, unpopular and hostile environments and the challenges they face should not be overlooked. This paper’s aim is not to criticise what is already widely regarded as a flawed sector within the aid industry; rather it is to constructively contribute to the debate on access.

It distinguishes two main thematic areas under which NGOs are unable to gain access to vulnerable populations, namely: technicalities and hostile conflict zones. It also explores the idea that these circumstances mask deeper factors in providing relief; strategic interest and convenience. These influences are indicative of a shift in aid policy which is discussed in an analysis on the implications of ‘access’ on aid policy in terms of conceptual, political and practical implications.

Author: Hannah Taylor

HD PDF NewUnder what circumstances are NGOs unable to gain access to vulnerable populations? What are the implications for aid policy? (2075)

Featured Projects

Featured Articles & Papers